Skip to content

Guides

What the research says

Plain-English summaries of the evidence on investing: from academic papers, regulators’ studies and long-run data. Where the evidence is mixed, the guides say so.

Start with Active vs passive funds, the evidence the other summaries build on.

Each summary states the question, the best evidence available, how big the effect is and the caveats, with links to the original papers and data so you can check the working. They are written for someone with no background in finance. When a new edition of an underlying study is published, the summary is updated and the review date changes; where the evidence is thin or contested, the guide says that rather than picking a side.

Guides

Global tracker ETFs compared: what really differs between them

VWRP, SWDA, VALL, FWRG and the rest all promise the whole world in one fund. They don't hold the same things, they don't charge the same, and the charge isn't the whole cost.

Lump sum or monthly? What the evidence says about drip-feeding

If you have a sum of money to invest, should it go in all at once or a bit at a time? The research is clear on the average, and honest about the exceptions.

Active vs passive funds: what the evidence shows

Should you pay a manager to try to beat the market, or simply buy the market? The arithmetic and the evidence point the same way, with some honest caveats.

Home bias: why UK investors over-own UK shares

The UK is a small slice of the world's stock markets. Most UK investors hold far more of it than that. Here's what the evidence says about the habit.

How many ETFs do you need? Diversification and overlap

More funds can feel safer. Sometimes they are; often they just hold the same companies twice. Here's what diversification actually does, with the data.

Coming next

New guides arrive every week.

  • Factor investing: value, size and momentum
  • Rebalancing: how often, and does it matter?
  • Market timing: what the evidence says
  • Fees and returns: why costs predict results